+testexpectsuccess pull -u with a tag should not work + git checkout master & + testconfigunchanged git pull -u upstream initialtag + + +testexpectsuccess pull -u on detached head should not work + git checkout. If we do git branch -vv again, we can see that jsChanges is now mapped to origin jsChanges. Since the idea is to have a similar behavior to git push -set-upstream, I think its not relevant to raise an. We can do -set-upstream or we can do -u, and then origin jsChanges. We have to push while setting the upstream to the origin jsChanges, just like this is origin master. When we do, we get a fatal error, because if we do git branch -vv, we don't have jsChanges linked to any remote branch. If we do a git log oneline, then we have "Adds Hello World" on the jsChanges branch, which has diverged from the master branch. Now we have moved our current workspace from the master branch, to the new branch. We'll commit that and we'll say, "Adds Hello World." In Git, a branch is a new/separate version of the main repository. Then, let's save that and do a git status. We'll make a function called helloWorld again, and we can say alert i. Before executing the following command make sure that you are on the branch that you want to push and set an Upstream for. It will not only push and create a new branch in the remote repository but also set it as an Upstream Branch. Master is linked to a remote, but jsChanges is just a local branch for now. We can do this by using the -set-upstream or the -u flag along with the Git Push command. If we do git branch -vv, for verbose mode, then we can see the current commit that we're on for each branch, and we can see the remote that we're on for each branch. We can also do git branch to see all of our branches. I decided to try it from the git bash yesterday, and I successfully created a new repo and committed files. If we do a git status, we can see that we're on the branch jsChanges. 910 I've been using github from a relatively short period, and I've always used the client to perform commits and pulls. That's what we'll do to make a new branch. We can do git branch and then our branch name like jsChanges or we can do git checkout -b jsChanges. I must confess don't comprehend of these commands - there seems lots of ways lots of similar sounding things, despite lots of googling/reading i'm still rookie.Instructor: We can create a new branch in two different ways. additional changes resulting pr feedback): git fetch -all -tag git pull upstream master git push origin master git checkout my_branch_name -t origin/masterĪnd save updates branch: git add -a git commit -amend -no-edit git fetch -all -tag git pull -rebase upstream master git push origin my_branch_name -f To store changes branch: git add -a git commit -m "summary of changed" git fetch -all -tag git pull -rebase upstream master git push origin my_branch_name Rename the default branch git branch -m master default. so git branch -set-upstream-to origin/ is the current command that works.Please use '-track' or '-set-upstream-to' instead. The above command will query the remote host for the HEAD upstream and it updates that upstream in the local. at 4:59 4 -set-upstream produces an error: fatal: the '-set-upstream' option is no longer supported. Update the upstream remote HEAD git remote set-head origin -a. To create new branch: git fetch -all -tag git pull upstream master git push origin master git checkout -b my_branch_name -t origin/master The above command will just fetch all the remote branches to your local. I've been making lot of rookie mistakes github, result i'm seeking foolproof (me-proof!) method ensuring that:Ī) new branches create on fork based on origin master, not other branch, and.ī) origin master up-to-date upstream master, and.Ĭ) when/before commit (push?), changes rebased upstream master.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |